Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Graham v. NRC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    Shawneequa Graham filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its chairman. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Graham appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found the defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 95-1851

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Shawneequa Graham filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its chairman. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Graham appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found the defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    Graham v. NRC, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Shawneequa Graham filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission and its chairman. The district court granted summary judgment to the defendants. Graham appealed. The appeals court reviewed the record and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found the defendants were entitled to summary judgment. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 95-1851

    SHAWNEEQUA M. GRAHAM,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION;
    IVAN SELIN, Chairman,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt.
    Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge.
    (CA-93-1808-DKC)
    Submitted:

    December 12, 1995

    Decided:

    January 4, 1996

    Before MURNAGHAN, HAMILTON, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.


    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Shawneequa M. Graham, Appellant Pro Se. David Ira Salem, Assistant
    United States Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order granting
    Appellees' summary judgment motion in her employment discrimination
    action. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Graham v. United States Nuclear
    Regulatory Comm'n, No. CA-93-1808-DKC (D. Md. Mar. 12, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like