Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Michael A. Goode v. Commonwealth of Virginia Portsmouth Police Department Portsmouth Circuit Court, 74 F.3d 1231, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Michael Goode appealed the denial of a writ of prohibition in federal district court regarding a state court case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning that Goode was not entitled to the writ. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-01-24 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 74 F.3d 1231 Docket: 95-7178

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Michael Goode appealed the denial of a writ of prohibition in federal district court regarding a state court case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning that Goode was not entitled to the writ. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Michael A. Goode v. Commonwealth of Virginia Portsmouth Police Department Portsmouth Circuit Court, 74 F.3d 1231, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Michael Goode appealed the denial of a writ of prohibition in federal district court regarding a state court case. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The appeals court agreed with the district court's reasoning that Goode was not entitled to the writ. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    74 F.

    3d 1231
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Michael A. GOODE, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA; Portsmouth Police
    Department;
    Portsmouth Circuit Court, Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-7178.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 11, 1996
    Decided Jan. 24, 1996

    Michael A. Goode, Appellant Pro Se.


    William Mark Dunn, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellees.
    Before RUSSELL, HALL and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying a writ of prohibition.
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Goode v. Virginia, No. CA-95-67 (E.D.Va. July 31, 1995). We dispense with
    oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented
    in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like