Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Barbara S. Minnich v. John M. Deutch, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, 91 F.3d 132, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Barbara Minnich filed a Privacy Act claim against the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-28 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 91 F.3d 132 Docket: 96-1418

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Barbara Minnich filed a Privacy Act claim against the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Barbara S. Minnich v. John M. Deutch, Director, Central Intelligence Agency, 91 F.3d 132, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Barbara Minnich filed a Privacy Act claim against the director of the Central Intelligence Agency, which was dismissed without prejudice by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the dismissal. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were clear in the materials provided to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    91 F.

    3d 132

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Barbara S. MINNICH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    John M. DEUTCH, Director, Central Intelligence Agency,
    Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-1418.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 20, 1996.
    Decided June 28, 1996.

    Barbara S. Minnich, Appellant Pro Se.


    Rachel Celia Ballow, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY,
    Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
    Before HALL, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing without prejudice
    Appellant's Privacy Act (5 U.S.C.A. 552a (West Supp.1996)) action. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Minnich v.
    Deutch, No. CA-95-1340-A (E.D.Va. Jan. 30, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like