Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Benjamin Henderson Jones v. Hope Dene Harris, Attorney, 89 F.3d 828, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Benjamin Henderson Jones's § 1983 complaint against attorney Hope Dene Harris under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments. The dismissal was affirmed without the need for further explanation.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-06-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 89 F.3d 828 Docket: 96-6350

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Benjamin Henderson Jones's § 1983 complaint against attorney Hope Dene Harris under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments. The dismissal was affirmed without the need for further explanation.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Benjamin Henderson Jones v. Hope Dene Harris, Attorney, 89 F.3d 828, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's dismissal of Benjamin Henderson Jones's § 1983 complaint against attorney Hope Dene Harris under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning for dismissing the case. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented, so the Fourth Circuit did not require oral arguments. The dismissal was affirmed without the need for further explanation.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    89 F.

    3d 828

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Benjamin Henderson JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Hope Dene HARRIS, Attorney, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-6350.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 11, 1996.
    Decided June 25, 1996.

    Benjamin Henderson Jones, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1988) complaint under 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (West 1994). We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Harris,
    No. CA-96-134-R (W.D.Va. Feb. 13, 1996). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like