Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Claude Hosch v. Bandag, Incorporated, 108 F.3d 1372, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    Claude Hosch filed a civil complaint against Bandag, Inc. which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Hosch appealed this decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit found Hosch's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 108 F.3d 1372 Docket: 96-2826

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Claude Hosch filed a civil complaint against Bandag, Inc. which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Hosch appealed this decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit found Hosch's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Claude Hosch v. Bandag, Incorporated, 108 F.3d 1372, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Claude Hosch filed a civil complaint against Bandag, Inc. which was denied by the district court under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Hosch appealed this decision to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit found Hosch's appeal to be frivolous and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the district court. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were clear based on the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    108 F.

    3d 1372

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Claude HOSCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    BANDAG, INCORPORATED, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 96-2826.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 13, 1997.
    Decided March 18, 1997.

    Claude Hosch, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before HALL, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his civil complaint
    under 28 U.S.C. 1915(e) (1994), amended by Prison Litigation Reform Act,
    Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We have reviewed the record and
    the district court's opinion and find that this appeal is frivolous. Accordingly,
    we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Hosch v. Bandag,
    No. CA-96-894-5-BR-2 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 6, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like