Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Perry Shippy v. D. Harold D. Moss C. Evans, 99 F.3d 1131, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Perry Shippy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court had denied relief to Shippy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and affirmed the lower court's decision, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-10-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 99 F.3d 1131 Docket: 96-6748

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Perry Shippy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court had denied relief to Shippy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and affirmed the lower court's decision, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Perry Shippy v. D. Harold D. Moss C. Evans, 99 F.3d 1131, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an appeals court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case brought by Perry Shippy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against several defendants. The district court had denied relief to Shippy pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(d). The appeals court found no reversible error in the district court's ruling and affirmed the lower court's decision, finding the facts and legal arguments adequately presented without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    99 F.

    3d 1131

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Perry SHIPPY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    D. HAROLD; D. Moss; C. Evans, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 96-6748.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Oct. 24, 1996.

    Perry Shippy, Appellant Pro Se.


    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    1983 (1994) complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(d) (1994), amended by
    Prison Litigation Reform Act, Pub.L. No. 104-134, 110 Stat. 1321 (1996). We
    have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible
    error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Shippy v.
    Harold, No. CA-96-307 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 24, 1996). We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like