Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Darryl D. Finney v. Naomi Long, Magistrate Mary v. Mehegan, Chief Magistrate, 56 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Darryl Finney filed a Section 1983 civil rights claim against two magistrates which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues are clearly presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-05-30 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 56 F.3d 61 Docket: 95-6327

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Darryl Finney filed a Section 1983 civil rights claim against two magistrates which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues are clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Darryl D. Finney v. Naomi Long, Magistrate Mary v. Mehegan, Chief Magistrate, 56 F.3d 61, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Darryl Finney filed a Section 1983 civil rights claim against two magistrates which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues are clearly presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    56 F.

    3d 61
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Darryl D. FINNEY, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Naomi LONG, Magistrate; Mary V. Mehegan, Chief
    Magistrate,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6327.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 20, 1995.
    Decided May 30, 1995.

    Darryl D. Finney, appellant pro se.


    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Finney v. Long, No. CA-95-192-A (E.D. Va.
    Feb. 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like