Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ronnie Dean Fogarty v. Mike Collins Bobby Artrip J.C. Hess, 66 F.3d 315, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Ronnie Dean Fogarty filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants (Mike Collins, Bobby Artrip, and J.C. Hess) which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-09-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 66 F.3d 315 Docket: 95-6992

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Ronnie Dean Fogarty filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants (Mike Collins, Bobby Artrip, and J.C. Hess) which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Ronnie Dean Fogarty v. Mike Collins Bobby Artrip J.C. Hess, 66 F.3d 315, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Ronnie Dean Fogarty filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against three defendants (Mike Collins, Bobby Artrip, and J.C. Hess) which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    66 F.

    3d 315

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ronnie Dean FOGARTY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Mike COLLINS; Bobby Artrip; J.C. Hess, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6992.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Aug. 24, 1995.
    Decided: Sept. 19, 1995.

    Ronnie Dean Fogarty, appellant pro se. Jill Theresa Bowers, OFFICE OF
    THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for
    Appellees.
    Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Fogarty v. Collins, No. CA-94-542-R (W.D.Va.
    June 19, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like