Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Jessie R. Winfield v. R. Boyers J. H. Lyle Jack Lee, 32 F.3d 563, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Jessie R. Winfield in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against defendants R. Boyers, J. H. Lyle, and Jack Lee. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in Winfield v. Boyers, No. CA-92-733-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 1993).

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-07-28 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 32 F.3d 563 Docket: 94-6089

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Jessie R. Winfield in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against defendants R. Boyers, J. H. Lyle, and Jack Lee. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in Winfield v. Boyers, No. CA-92-733-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 1993).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Jessie R. Winfield v. R. Boyers J. H. Lyle Jack Lee, 32 F.3d 563, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to Appellant Jessie R. Winfield in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint against defendants R. Boyers, J. H. Lyle, and Jack Lee. The Fourth Circuit found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It therefore affirmed the district court's ruling based on the reasoning in Winfield v. Boyers, No. CA-92-733-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 1993).

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    32 F.

    3d 563
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Jessie R. WINFIELD, Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    R. BOYERS; J. H. Lyle; Jack Lee, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 94-6089.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: July 19, 1994
    Decided: July 28, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-92-733-R)
    Jessie R. Winfield, Appellant Pro Se.
    Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond,
    Virginia, for Appellees.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Winfield v. Boyers, No. CA-92-733-R
    (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like