33 F.

3d 51

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of

unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Francis Russell HOLLEY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH; William Filbert; Robert Bond,
Classification; Pamela Sorensen, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6634.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1944.
Decided August 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-800-HAR)
Francis Russell Holley, appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of
the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM
1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Smith, No. CA-94-800-HAR (D.

Md. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED