Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anthony Perron Price v. Pete Clary, 64 F.3d 658, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Anthony Perron Price's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Pete Clary. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-08-14 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 64 F.3d 658 Docket: 95-6843

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Anthony Perron Price's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Pete Clary. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Anthony Perron Price v. Pete Clary, 64 F.3d 658, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Anthony Perron Price's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Pete Clary. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The court therefore affirmed the district court's ruling based on the same reasoning.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    64 F.

    3d 658

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Anthony Perron PRICE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Pete CLARY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 95-6843.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 25, 1995.
    Decided Aug. 14, 1995.

    Anthony Perron Price, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WILKINS, NIEMEYER, and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Price v. Clary, No. CA-94-683-6 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 31, 1995). Leave to proceed in
    forma pauperis is granted. We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like