Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Wilbert Andrew Allen, Sr. v. E. Preston Oldham, Sheriff, Thomas Andrews, Captain, 861 F.2d 263, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    12 views1 page
    Wilbert Andrew Allen Sr. filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the sheriff and a captain alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-09-27 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 861 F.2d 263 Docket: 88-6692

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Wilbert Andrew Allen Sr. filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the sheriff and a captain alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    12 views1 page

    Wilbert Andrew Allen, Sr. v. E. Preston Oldham, Sheriff, Thomas Andrews, Captain, 861 F.2d 263, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Wilbert Andrew Allen Sr. filed a lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against the sheriff and a captain alleging civil rights violations. The district court denied relief and adopted the recommendation of the magistrate. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    861 F.

    2d 263
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Wilbert Andrew ALLEN, Sr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    E. Preston OLDHAM, Sheriff, Thomas Andrews, Captain,
    Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-6692.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 19, 1988.
    Decided Sept. 27, 1988.

    Wilbert Andrew Allen, Sr., appellant pro se.


    Allan R. Gitter, Womble, Carlyle, Sandbridge & Rice, for appellees.
    Before WIDENER, ERVIN, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Wilbert Andrew Allen, Sr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this
    appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district
    court. Allen v. Oldham, C/A No. 87-639-C-WS (M.D.N.C. June 10, 1988). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like