Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. E.C. Morris, 875 F.2d 314, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views1 page
    Frank Altizer filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against E.C. Morris which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively so no oral argument was necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-05-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 875 F.2d 314 Docket: 89-6523

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Frank Altizer filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against E.C. Morris which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively so no oral argument was necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views1 page

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr. v. E.C. Morris, 875 F.2d 314, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Frank Altizer filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against E.C. Morris which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling in a per curiam opinion without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively so no oral argument was necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    875 F.

    2d 314
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Frank Ervin ALTIZER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    E.C. MORRIS, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 89-6523.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted April 11, 1989.
    Decided May 8, 1989.

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., appellant pro se.


    Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.
    Before PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Frank Ervin Altizer, Jr., appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Altizer v. Morris, C/A No. 87-139-L
    (W.D.Va. Jan. 17, 1989). We dispense with oral argument because the
    dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like