Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Van Prince Welch v. J.H. Snodgrass Margaret Urquhart, 867 F.2d 610, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    Van Welch filed a Section 1983 claim against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The dispositive issue had also been recently decided by authoritative precedent.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1989-01-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 867 F.2d 610 Docket: 88-6828

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Van Welch filed a Section 1983 claim against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The dispositive issue had also been recently decided by authoritative precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    Van Prince Welch v. J.H. Snodgrass Margaret Urquhart, 867 F.2d 610, 4th Cir. (1989)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Van Welch filed a Section 1983 claim against two defendants which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding the appeal to be without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The dispositive issue had also been recently decided by authoritative precedent.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    867 F.

    2d 610
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Van Prince WELCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    J.H. SNODGRASS; Margaret Urquhart, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-6828.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 9, 1988.
    Decided: Jan. 17, 1989.

    Van Prince Welch, appellant pro se.


    Eric Karl Gould Fiske (Office of the Attorney General), for appellees.
    Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Van Prince Welch appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
    42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Welch v. Snodgrass, C/A No. 87-818-N
    (E.D.Va. Oct. 4, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the dispositive
    issue recently has been decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like