Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Priscilla Scarborough v. Dr. Ridley, Anne Downes, Warden, 817 F.2d 102, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    11 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1987 regarding Priscilla Scarborough's appeal of a magistrate's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against Dr. Ridley. The three judge panel reviewed the record and magistrate's opinion and found the appeal to be without merit, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided in other cases. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning of the magistrate in Scarborough v. Ridley.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1987-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 817 F.2d 102 Docket: 86-6824

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1987 regarding Priscilla Scarborough's appeal of a magistrate's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against Dr. Ridley. The three judge panel reviewed the record and magistrate's opinion and found the appeal to be without merit, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided in other cases. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning of the magistrate in Scarborough v. Ridley.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    11 views1 page

    Priscilla Scarborough v. Dr. Ridley, Anne Downes, Warden, 817 F.2d 102, 4th Cir. (1987)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from 1987 regarding Priscilla Scarborough's appeal of a magistrate's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 against Dr. Ridley. The three judge panel reviewed the record and magistrate's opinion and found the appeal to be without merit, as the dispositive issues had been recently decided in other cases. The panel affirmed the lower court's judgment without oral argument, citing the reasoning of the magistrate in Scarborough v. Ridley.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    817 F.

    2d 102
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Priscilla SCARBOROUGH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Dr. RIDLEY, Defendant-Appellee,
    Anne Downes, Warden, Defendant.
    No. 86-6824.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 29, 1987.
    Decided April 22, 1987.

    Before RUSSELL, WIDENER and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.


    Priscilla Scarborough, appellant pro se.
    Mary Moffett Hutcheson Priddy, McGuire, Woods & Battle, for appellee.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the magistrate's opinion discloses that this appeal
    from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
    Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
    dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
    the magistrate. Scarborough v. Ridley, C/A No. 86-525-R (E.D.Va., Dec. 9,
    1986).

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like