Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Franklin Daryl Sutherland v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of The State of North Carolina, 843 F.2d 1388, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1988. It dismisses an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. The appeals court finds no merit to the appeal after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It denies a certificate of probable cause to appeal, denies appointment of counsel, and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-03-29 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 843 F.2d 1388 Docket: 87-6671

    Original Title

    Franklin Daryl Sutherland v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of the State of North Carolina, 843 F.2d 1388, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1988. It dismisses an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. The appeals court finds no merit to the appeal after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It denies a certificate of probable cause to appeal, denies appointment of counsel, and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Franklin Daryl Sutherland v. David W. Chester, Attorney General of The State of North Carolina, 843 F.2d 1388, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1988. It dismisses an appeal from a district court's denial of habeas corpus relief under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254. The appeals court finds no merit to the appeal after reviewing the record and district court opinion. It denies a certificate of probable cause to appeal, denies appointment of counsel, and dismisses the appeal based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its previous ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    843 F.

    2d 1388
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Franklin Daryl SUTHERLAND, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    David W. CHESTER, Attorney General of the State of North
    Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
    No. 87-6671.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 29, 1988.
    Decided March 29, 1988.

    Franklin Daryl Sutherland, appellant pro se.


    Richard Norwood League, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina,
    for appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE, and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that an appeal
    from its order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254
    would be without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal, deny
    appointment of counsel, dispense with oral argument, and dismiss the appeal on
    the reasoning of the district court. Sutherland v. Chester, C/A No. 87-200-A-C
    (W.D.N.C. Oct. 7, 1987).

    DISMISSED.

    You might also like