Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Charles Redfearn v. State of Maryland, 857 F.2d 1469, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a Section 1983 claim brought by Charles Redfearn against the State of Maryland. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of relief in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, noting the dispositive issue had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-09-06 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 857 F.2d 1469 Docket: 88-7631

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a Section 1983 claim brought by Charles Redfearn against the State of Maryland. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of relief in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, noting the dispositive issue had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Charles Redfearn v. State of Maryland, 857 F.2d 1469, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1988 regarding a Section 1983 claim brought by Charles Redfearn against the State of Maryland. The appellate court affirmed the district court's denial of relief in a per curiam opinion, finding the appeal without merit based on the district court's reasoning. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, noting the dispositive issue had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    857 F.

    2d 1469
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Charles REDFEARN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    STATE OF MARYLAND, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 88-7631.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: June 29, 1988.
    Decided: Sept. 6, 1988.

    Charles Redfearn, appellant pro se.


    Richard M. Kastendieck (Office of the Attorney General of Maryland),
    for appellee.
    Before K.K. HALL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and WILKINSON,
    Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Charles Redfearn appeals from the district court's order denying relief under 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is
    without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Redfearn v. State of Maryland, C/A No. 87-1574-Y (D.Md. Apr. 13, 1988). We
    dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issue recently has been
    decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like