Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Stephen Charzan v. David P. O'dea, Aaron J. Johnson, 861 F.2d 263, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    8 views1 page
    Stephen Charzan appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision because Charzan waived his right to appellate review by failing to timely object to the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1988-10-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 861 F.2d 263 Docket: 88-7160

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Stephen Charzan appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision because Charzan waived his right to appellate review by failing to timely object to the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    8 views1 page

    Stephen Charzan v. David P. O'dea, Aaron J. Johnson, 861 F.2d 263, 4th Cir. (1988)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Stephen Charzan appealed the district court's dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision because Charzan waived his right to appellate review by failing to timely object to the magistrate's recommendation. The appeals court dispensed with oral argument as the dispositive issues had been recently decided authoritatively.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    861 F.

    2d 263
    Unpublished Disposition

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Stephen CHARZAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    David P. O'DEA, Aaron J. Johnson, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 88-7160.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Aug. 22, 1988.
    Decided Oct. 4, 1988.

    Stephen Charzan, appellant pro se.


    Jacob Leonard Safron, Office of Attorney General of North Carolina, for
    appellees.
    Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Stephen Charzan seeks to appeal the district court's order accepting the
    recommendation of the magistrate which resulted in dismissal of his action
    filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983. Our review of the record discloses that
    Charzan waived his right to appellate review by failing to timely object to the
    magistrate's recommendation. Accordingly, we affirm the judgment of the
    district court. Charzan v. O'Dea, C-87-619-S (M.D.N.C. May 13, 1988). We
    dispense with oral argument because the dispositive issues recently have been
    decided authoritatively.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like