Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Herbert William Jones, Jr. v. L. Thompson v. Fitzgerald M. Harris, 48 F.3d 1216, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Herbert William Jones Jr. filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials L. Thompson, V. Fitzgerald, and M. Harris which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Jones' appeal. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid their decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-02-16 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 48 F.3d 1216 Docket: 94-7048

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Herbert William Jones Jr. filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials L. Thompson, V. Fitzgerald, and M. Harris which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Jones' appeal. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Herbert William Jones, Jr. v. L. Thompson v. Fitzgerald M. Harris, 48 F.3d 1216, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Herbert William Jones Jr. filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials L. Thompson, V. Fitzgerald, and M. Harris which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Jones' appeal. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials and argument would not aid their decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    48 F.

    3d 1216
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Herbert William JONES, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    L. THOMPSON; V. Fitzgerald; M. Harris, DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 94-7048.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
    Decided Feb. 16, 1995.

    Herbert William Jones, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    Carlyle Randolph Wimbish, III, Sands, Anderson, Marks & Miller,
    Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
    Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42
    U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district
    court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Jones v. Thompson, No. CA-93185-AM (E.D. Va. Aug. 10, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like