Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Tommy Gibbs v. Van Barnes Sgt. Everett, 16 F.3d 409, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    14 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Tommy Gibbs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Van Barnes and Sgt. Everett. The Fourth Circuit found that the appeal was without merit based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The district court's ruling was affirmed.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-01-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 16 F.3d 409 Docket: 93-7052

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Tommy Gibbs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Van Barnes and Sgt. Everett. The Fourth Circuit found that the appeal was without merit based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The district court's ruling was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    14 views2 pages

    Tommy Gibbs v. Van Barnes Sgt. Everett, 16 F.3d 409, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Tommy Gibbs' 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Van Barnes and Sgt. Everett. The Fourth Circuit found that the appeal was without merit based on its review of the record and district court opinion. The facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials so oral arguments would not aid in the decision. The district court's ruling was affirmed.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    16 F.

    3d 409
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Tommy GIBBS, Plaintiff Appellant,


    v.
    VAN BARNES; Sgt. Everett, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-7052.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Dec. 16, 1993.
    Jan. 14, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    North Carolina, at Raleigh; Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge.
    Tommy Gibbs, appellant pro se.
    E.D.N.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Gibbs v. Barnes, No. CA-93-415 (E.D.N.C.
    Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like