Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Walter R. Thompson, Jr. v. C. Holly, Employee Correctional Medical System J. Webster, Director, Employer, 19 F.3d 1430, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Walter Thompson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical employees. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's opinion and filings. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning that Thompson's appeal was without merit.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-03-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 19 F.3d 1430 Docket: 93-7059

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Walter Thompson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical employees. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's opinion and filings. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning that Thompson's appeal was without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Walter R. Thompson, Jr. v. C. Holly, Employee Correctional Medical System J. Webster, Director, Employer, 19 F.3d 1430, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Thompson appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison medical employees. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without hearing oral arguments, finding that the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the lower court's opinion and filings. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning that Thompson's appeal was without merit.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    19 F.

    3d 1430

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Walter R. THOMPSON, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    C. HOLLY, Employee; Correctional Medical System; J.
    Webster, Director, Employer, Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-7059.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted March 17, 1994.
    Decided March 31, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge.
    Walter R. Thompson, Jr., appellant pro se.
    Jeff Wayne Rose, Adler, Rosen & Peters, P.C., Virginia Beach, VA, for
    appellees.
    E.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Thompson v. Holly, No. CA-92-1209-2
    (E.D. Va. Sept. 16, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court

    and argument would not aid the decisional process.


    AFFIRMED

    You might also like