Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Vincent Springs v. Edward W. Murray, 38 F.3d 1213, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    18 views2 pages
    Vincent Springs appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition by a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal was without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-10-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 38 F.3d 1213 Docket: 93-6975

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Vincent Springs appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition by a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal was without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    18 views2 pages

    Vincent Springs v. Edward W. Murray, 38 F.3d 1213, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Vincent Springs appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition by a magistrate judge in the Eastern District of Virginia. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found the appeal was without merit. The court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the reasoning of the magistrate judge. The court determined oral argument was not necessary because the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    38 F.

    3d 1213
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Vincent SPRINGS, Petitioner Appellant,


    v.
    Edward W. MURRAY, Respondent Appellee.
    No. 93-6975.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: January 11, 1994
    Decided: October 14, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
    Virginia, at Richmond. David G. Lowe, Magistrate Judge. (CA-92-373-R)
    Vincent Springs, Appellant Pro Se.
    Robert B. Condon, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for
    Appellee.
    E.D.Va.
    DISMISSED.
    Before WIDENER and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the magistrate judge's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition.* Our review of the record and the magistrate
    judge's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we
    deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the
    reasoning of the magistrate judge. Springs v. Murray, No. CA-92-373-R (E.D.
    Va. Aug. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and

    argument would not aid the decisional process.


    DISMISSED

    The action was decided by a magistrate judge with the parties' consent. See 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 636(c)(1) (1988)

    You might also like