Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. John David Moss, 19 F.3d 1431, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views2 pages
    John David Moss appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 28, 1993 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 19 F.3d 1431 Docket: 93-7236

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John David Moss appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 28, 1993 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views2 pages

    United States v. John David Moss, 19 F.3d 1431, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John David Moss appealed the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial, finding the appeal had no merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its October 28, 1993 decision. The Fourth Circuit found oral arguments were not necessary as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials submitted.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    19 F.

    3d 1431

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    John David MOSS, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 93-7236.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: Jan. 20, 1994.
    Decided: Feb. 25, 1994.

    Appeal from the United Statees District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CR-89-21, CA-93204)
    John David Moss, Appellant Pro Se.
    Karen Breeding Peters, Assistant United States Attorney, Roanoke, VA,
    for Appellee.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. United States v. Moss, Nos. CR-89-21; CA-93204 (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the

    facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
    Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like