Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Anthony Baker, 19 F.3d 1430, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1994 where Anthony Baker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. It adopted the district court's reasoning and denied Baker's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-03-17 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 19 F.3d 1430 Docket: 94-6029

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1994 where Anthony Baker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. It adopted the district court's reasoning and denied Baker's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Anthony Baker, 19 F.3d 1430, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document summarizes a United States Court of Appeals case from 1994 where Anthony Baker appealed the district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 motion to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. It adopted the district court's reasoning and denied Baker's motion for appointment of counsel.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    19 F.

    3d 1430

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    Anthony BAKER, Defendant Appellant.
    No. 94-6029.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
    Decided March 17, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore, Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CR-90-324-S, CA-934022-S)
    Anthony Baker, appellant pro se.
    Ethan L. Bauman, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec.
    2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
    discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court.* United States v. Baker, Nos. CR-90-324-S; CA93-4022-S (D. Md. Dec. 13, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because
    the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before

    the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    2

    AFFIRMED.

    We deny Appellant's Motion for Appointment of Counsel

    You might also like