Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ronald E. Reed, Jr. v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, 28 F.3d 1210, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views2 pages
    Ronald Reed Jr. appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his complaint against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency relating to the alleged confiscation of his property. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 28, 1994 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-07-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 28 F.3d 1210 Docket: 94-1187

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Reed Jr. appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his complaint against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency relating to the alleged confiscation of his property. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 28, 1994 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views2 pages

    Ronald E. Reed, Jr. v. U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency, 28 F.3d 1210, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Reed Jr. appealed a district court ruling denying relief on his complaint against the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency relating to the alleged confiscation of his property. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 28, 1994 opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the materials available to the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    28 F.

    3d 1210

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ronald E. REED, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    U.S. DRUG ENFORCEMENT AGENCY, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 94-1187.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 23, 1994.
    Decided July 15, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-3954)
    Ronald E. Reed, Jr., appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE,
    Senior Circuit Judge.

    PER CURIAM
    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his complaint
    relating to the alleged confiscation of his property. Our review of the record
    and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Reed v. DEA,
    No. CA-93-3954 (D. Md. Jan. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
    materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like