Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    Ronald Carmichael filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Carmichael appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit ruled to affirm the district court's denial of relief on Carmichael's § 1983 complaint.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 68 F.3d 459 Docket: 95-7206

    Original Title

    Ronald Carmichael v. J.R. Hunt, Superintendent Michael Lamm, Assistant Superintendent William S. Barker, Sergeant Mark Barhill, 68 F.3d 459, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ronald Carmichael filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Carmichael appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit ruled to affirm the district court's denial of relief on Carmichael's § 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ronald Carmichael filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Carmichael appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the court materials. The Fourth Circuit ruled to affirm the district court's denial of relief on Carmichael's § 1983 complaint.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    68 F.

    3d 459

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Ronald CARMICHAEL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    J.R. HUNT, Superintendent; Michael Lamm, Assistant
    Superintendent; William S. Barker, Sergeant;
    Mark Barhill, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-7206.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Oct. 3, 1995.
    Decided Oct. 19, 1995.

    Ronald Carmichael, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before WIDENER and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior
    Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Carmichael v. Hunt, No. CA-95-182-5-CT-BO
    (E.D.N.C. July 28, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like