Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Edward Germany v. Carroll A. Campbell, JR., Governor, Ex Officio Scdc/governor, 60 F.3d 821, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It discusses an appeal filed by Edward Germany against Carroll Campbell regarding Germany's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court denied relief on Germany's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 31, 1995 ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-07-11 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 60 F.3d 821 Docket: 95-6268

    Original Title

    Edward Germany v. Carroll A. Campbell, Jr., Governor, Ex Officio Scdc/governor, 60 F.3d 821, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It discusses an appeal filed by Edward Germany against Carroll Campbell regarding Germany's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court denied relief on Germany's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 31, 1995 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    Edward Germany v. Carroll A. Campbell, JR., Governor, Ex Officio Scdc/governor, 60 F.3d 821, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It discusses an appeal filed by Edward Germany against Carroll Campbell regarding Germany's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint. The district court denied relief on Germany's complaint. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its January 31, 1995 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    60 F.

    3d 821
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Edward GERMANY, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    Carroll A. CAMPBELL, Jr., Governor, Ex Officio
    SCDC/Governor, Defendant--Appellee.
    No. 95-6268.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted June 22, 1995.
    Decided July 11, 1995.

    Edward Germany, appellant pro se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr., Tompkins
    & McMaster, Columbia, SC, for appellee.
    D.S.C.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Germany v. Camp bell, No. CA-94-181-3-8BD (D.S.C. Jan. 31, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like