Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Douglas E. Gatling v. Robert J. McCade Sheriff Windian Marie Jones, 61 F.3d 899, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views1 page
    Douglas Gatling filed a Section 1983 complaint against Sheriff Robert McCade and Windian Jones that was denied by the district court. Gatling appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Gatling's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-07-18 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 61 F.3d 899 Docket: 95-6787

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Douglas Gatling filed a Section 1983 complaint against Sheriff Robert McCade and Windian Jones that was denied by the district court. Gatling appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Gatling's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views1 page

    Douglas E. Gatling v. Robert J. McCade Sheriff Windian Marie Jones, 61 F.3d 899, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Douglas Gatling filed a Section 1983 complaint against Sheriff Robert McCade and Windian Jones that was denied by the district court. Gatling appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit also denied Gatling's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    61 F.

    3d 899

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Douglas E. GATLING, Plaintiff--Appellant,
    v.
    Robert J. McCADE, Sheriff; Windian Marie Jones,
    Defendants--Appellees.
    No. 95-6787.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: June 22, 1995.
    Decided: July 18, 1995.

    Douglas E. Gatling, appellant pro se.


    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. Gatling v. McCade, No. CA-95-601-AM
    (E.D.Va. May 9, 1995). We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of
    counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like