Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    7 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from August 22, 1995. The plaintiff, Nathaniel Morgan, filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against several defendants. The district court denied relief on Morgan's complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-08-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 64 F.3d 658 Docket: 95-6859

    Original Title

    Nathaniel Morgan v. George Padgett, Betty Cummings, Donald R. McTaggart John L. Reid, and Don Neal, in Their Individual Capacities, 64 F.3d 658, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from August 22, 1995. The plaintiff, Nathaniel Morgan, filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against several defendants. The district court denied relief on Morgan's complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    7 views2 pages

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from August 22, 1995. The plaintiff, Nathaniel Morgan, filed a Section 1983 civil rights complaint against several defendants. The district court denied relief on Morgan's complaint. The appellate court reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's decision to deny relief based on the reasoning in the lower court's opinion. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    64 F.

    3d 658

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Nathaniel MORGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    George PADGETT, Betty Cummings, Donald R. Mctaggart,
    John L.
    Reid, and Don Neal, in their individual
    capacities, Defendants-Appellees.
    No. 95-6859.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted July 27, 1995.
    Decided Aug. 22, 1995.

    Nathaniel Morgan, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, MOTZ, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Morgan v. Padgett, No. CA-95-1122-3-19BC (D.S.C. May 11, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like