Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Joe Carroll Lineberger v. Talmadge Barnett Lieutenant Raynor Bobby Howell, and Captain Raynor, 60 F.3d 823, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    2 views1 page
    Joe Carroll Lineberger filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Lineberger appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-07-14 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 60 F.3d 823 Docket: 95-6587

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Joe Carroll Lineberger filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Lineberger appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    2 views1 page

    Joe Carroll Lineberger v. Talmadge Barnett Lieutenant Raynor Bobby Howell, and Captain Raynor, 60 F.3d 823, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Joe Carroll Lineberger filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. Lineberger appealed to the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals. The Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    60 F.

    3d 823
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Joe Carroll LINEBERGER, Plaintiff--Appellant,


    v.
    Talmadge BARNETT; Lieutenant Raynor; Bobby Howell,
    Defendants--Appellees,
    and
    Captain Raynor, Defendant.
    No. 95-6587.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: June 22, 1995.
    Decided: July 14, 1995.

    Joe Carroll Lineberger, appellant pro se. William McBlief, North Carolina
    Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for appellees.
    Before HALL, MURNAGHAN, and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Lineberger v. Barnett, No. CA-93-462-H-5 (E.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED.

    You might also like