Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Ralph Seagle v. Grant Spicer Herb Myers Scott Hamby, Ralph Seagle v. Grant Spicer Herb Myers Scott Hamby, 60 F.3d 824, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Ralph Seagle filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against three defendants which was denied by the district court. Seagle appealed the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-06-29 Precedential Status: Precedential Citations: 60 F.3d 824 Docket: 95-6560

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Ralph Seagle filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against three defendants which was denied by the district court. Seagle appealed the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    Ralph Seagle v. Grant Spicer Herb Myers Scott Hamby, Ralph Seagle v. Grant Spicer Herb Myers Scott Hamby, 60 F.3d 824, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Ralph Seagle filed a 42 U.S.C. 1983 complaint against three defendants which was denied by the district court. Seagle appealed the district court's decision. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no errors in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained without needing oral arguments.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    60 F.

    3d 824
    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
    dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
    of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
    Fourth Circuit.

    Ralph SEAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,


    v.
    Grant SPICER; Herb Myers; Scott Hamby, DefendantsAppellees.
    Ralph SEAGLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Grant SPICER; Herb Myers; Scott Hamby, Defendants-Appellees.
    Nos. 95-6560, 95-6561.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted May 18, 1995
    Decided June 29, 1995

    Ralph Seagle, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation, and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Seagle v. Spicer, No. CA-95-44-4 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 28 & Apr. 6, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like