Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Carl Roger Coulter v. Richard A. Lanham, SR., 28 F.3d 1208, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Carl Roger Coulter's § 1983 complaint. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-06-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 28 F.3d 1208 Docket: 94-6223

    Original Title

    Carl Roger Coulter v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr., 28 F.3d 1208, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Carl Roger Coulter's § 1983 complaint. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Carl Roger Coulter v. Richard A. Lanham, SR., 28 F.3d 1208, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's denial of relief on Carl Roger Coulter's § 1983 complaint. In a per curiam opinion, the Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court, which found the appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit also declined to hold oral arguments, as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    28 F.

    3d 1208

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Carl Roger COULTER, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    Richard A. LANHAM, SR., Defendant Appellee.
    No. 94-6223.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: May 24, 1994
    Decided: June 20, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-51)
    Carl Roger Coulter, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Coulter v. Lanham, No. CA-94-51 (D. Md.
    Jan. 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    You might also like