Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Charles Alexander Clark v. Christopher Graul, Detective Baltimore Police Department, 19 F.3d 1428, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Charles Clark filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against Detective Christopher Graul and the Baltimore Police Department. The district court denied relief to Clark and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Clark's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in the district court's October 26, 1993 opinion.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1994-02-25 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 19 F.3d 1428 Docket: 93-7256

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Charles Clark filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against Detective Christopher Graul and the Baltimore Police Department. The district court denied relief to Clark and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Clark's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in the district court's October 26, 1993 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Charles Alexander Clark v. Christopher Graul, Detective Baltimore Police Department, 19 F.3d 1428, 4th Cir. (1994)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Charles Clark filed a civil rights lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 against Detective Christopher Graul and the Baltimore Police Department. The district court denied relief to Clark and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit in Clark's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in the district court's October 26, 1993 opinion.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    19 F.

    3d 1428

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Charles Alexander CLARK, Plaintiff Appellant,
    v.
    Christopher GRAUL, Detective; Baltimore Police Department,
    Defendants Appellees.
    No. 93-7256.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted January 20, 1994.
    Decided: February 25, 1994.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
    at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-2987)
    Charles Alexander Clark, Appellant Pro Se.
    D.Md.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

    PER CURIAM
    1

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
    the reasoning of the district court. Clark v. Graul, No. CA-93-2987 (D. Md.
    Oct. 26, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like