Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • John McGhee v. Franklin E. Freeman, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction, 68 F.3d 460, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    5 views1 page
    John McGhee filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Franklin Freeman, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Correction. The district court denied relief on McGhee's complaint and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 68 F.3d 460 Docket: 95-7217

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    John McGhee filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Franklin Freeman, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Correction. The district court denied relief on McGhee's complaint and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    5 views1 page

    John McGhee v. Franklin E. Freeman, Secretary, North Carolina Department of Correction, 68 F.3d 460, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    John McGhee filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Franklin Freeman, Secretary of the North Carolina Department of Correction. The district court denied relief on McGhee's complaint and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, determining the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    68 F.

    3d 460

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    John MCGHEE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Franklin E. FREEMAN, Secretary, North Carolina
    Department of
    Correction, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 95-7217.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: September 21, 1995.
    Decided: October 13, 1995.

    John McGhee, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. McGhee v. Freeman, No. CA-95-301-5-CT-BO
    (E.D.N.C. July 27, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like