Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Milton McCray v. Thomas R. Corcoran, Warden, 67 F.3d 295, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    6 views1 page
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from October 4, 1995. Milton McCray filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Thomas Corcoran, the warden. The district court denied McCray relief and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error and agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in case number CA-94-3558-MJG. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-04 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 67 F.3d 295 Docket: 95-6886

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from October 4, 1995. Milton McCray filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Thomas Corcoran, the warden. The district court denied McCray relief and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error and agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in case number CA-94-3558-MJG. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    6 views1 page

    Milton McCray v. Thomas R. Corcoran, Warden, 67 F.3d 295, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from October 4, 1995. Milton McCray filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Thomas Corcoran, the warden. The district court denied McCray relief and he appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error and agreeing with the district court's reasoning as presented in case number CA-94-3558-MJG. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    67 F.

    3d 295

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Milton McCRAY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Thomas R. CORCORAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
    No. 95-6886.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Oct. 4, 1995.

    Milton McCray, Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney
    General, Audrey J.S. Carrion, Amy Kushner Kline, Office of the Attorney
    General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
    Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
    reasoning of the district court. McCray v. Corcoran, No. CA-94-3558-MJG
    (D.Md. Apr. 20, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
    argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like