Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Reginald Donald Campbell, 94 F.3d 642, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views1 page
    Reginald Donald Campbell appealed the district court's denial of his habeas motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Campbell's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1996-08-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 94 F.3d 642 Docket: 96-6460

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Reginald Donald Campbell appealed the district court's denial of his habeas motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Campbell's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views1 page

    United States v. Reginald Donald Campbell, 94 F.3d 642, 4th Cir. (1996)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Reginald Donald Campbell appealed the district court's denial of his habeas motion. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error, affirming the district court's ruling. The appeals court denied Campbell's motion for appointment of counsel and dispensed with oral arguments, determining the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    94 F.

    3d 642

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
    v.
    Reginald Donald CAMPBELL, Defendant-Appellant.
    No. 96-6460.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Aug. 20, 1996.

    Reginald Donald Campbell, Appellant Pro Se. James Michael Sullivan,


    Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.
    Before MURNAGHAN and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
    Senior Circuit Judge.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his habeas motion, 28
    U.S.C. 2255 (1988), amended by Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty
    Act of 1996, Pub.L. No. 104-132, 110 Stat. 1214. We have reviewed the record
    and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we
    affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Campbell, Nos.
    CR-93-138; CA-96-61-3-P (W.D.N.C. Mar. 6, 1996). We further deny
    Appellant's motion for the appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral
    argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
    process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like