Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Ronald Angelone, Director, 68 F.3d 459, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views1 page
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Peter Emmanuel Bernard's appeal of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As a result, the court denied Bernard a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed his appeal, also denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1995-10-13 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 68 F.3d 459 Docket: 95-7153

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Peter Emmanuel Bernard's appeal of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As a result, the court denied Bernard a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed his appeal, also denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views1 page

    Peter Emmanuel Bernard v. Ronald Angelone, Director, 68 F.3d 459, 4th Cir. (1995)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is a court ruling from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit denying Peter Emmanuel Bernard's appeal of a district court's denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition. The court of appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. As a result, the court denied Bernard a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed his appeal, also denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    68 F.

    3d 459

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Peter Emmanuel BERNARD, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Ronald ANGELONE, Director, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 95-7153.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted: September 21, 1995.
    Decided: October 13, 1995.

    Peter Emmanuel Bernard, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
    U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district
    court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate
    of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the
    district court. We also deny Appellant's motion to proceed in forma pauperis on
    appeal. Bernard v. Angelone, No. CA-94-681-R (E.D. Va. June 26, 1995). We
    dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
    aid the decisional process.
    DISMISSED

    You might also like