Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Rice v. LaManna, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of James Robert Rice's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Rice v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03078-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2006-09-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 06-7011

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of James Robert Rice's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Rice v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03078-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Rice v. LaManna, 4th Cir. (2006)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal of James Robert Rice's 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. The court reviewed the record and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's ruling for the reasons stated in Rice v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03078-PMD (D.S.C. Apr. 21, 2006). The court dispensed with oral argument because the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 06-7011

    JAMES ROBERT RICE,


    Petitioner - Appellant,
    versus
    JOHN J. LAMANNA,
    Respondent - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Florence.
    Patrick Michael Duffy, District
    Judge. (4:05-cv-03078-PMD)

    Submitted: August 24, 2006

    Decided: September 1, 2006

    Before KING, SHEDD, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    James Robert Rice, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    James

    Robert

    Rice,

    federal

    prisoner,

    appeals

    the

    district courts order dismissing his 28 U.S.C. 2241 (2000)


    petition.
    error.

    We have reviewed the record and find no reversible


    Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

    district court.

    Rice v. LaManna, No. 4:05-cv-03078-PMD (D.S.C.

    Apr. 21, 2006).

    We dispense with oral argument because the facts

    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials


    before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like