Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Lamont Christian, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lamont Isaac Christian's motion to reduce his sentence. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Christian had appealed the denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to reduce his sentence. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-06-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6525

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lamont Isaac Christian's motion to reduce his sentence. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Christian had appealed the denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to reduce his sentence. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Lamont Christian, 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of Lamont Isaac Christian's motion to reduce his sentence. The unpublished opinion found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. Christian had appealed the denial of his motion under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) to reduce his sentence. The appellate court dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6525

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    LAMONT ISAAC CHRISTIAN, a/k/a LA,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
    District of Virginia, at Newport News.
    Raymond A. Jackson,
    District Judge. (4:03-cr-00051-RAJ-FBS-1)

    Submitted:

    June 14, 2012

    Decided: June 20, 2012

    Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Lamont Isaac Christian, Appellant Pro Se.


    Lisa Rae McKeel,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Newport News, Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Lamont
    order denying

    Isaac

    his

    Christian

    motion

    for

    appeals

    reduction

    the
    of

    district

    sentence

    courts

    under

    18

    U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006).

    We have reviewed the record and

    find

    Accordingly,

    no

    reasons

    reversible
    stated

    by

    error.
    the

    district

    we

    court.

    affirm

    United

    for

    States

    the
    v.

    Christian, No. 4:03-cr-00051-RAJ-FBS-1 (E.D. Va. Mar. 2, 2012).


    We

    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like