Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Rideout, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Kevin A. Rideout's appeal of a district court order granting his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2010-06-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 09-7937

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Kevin A. Rideout's appeal of a district court order granting his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    United States v. Rideout, 4th Cir. (2010)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding Kevin A. Rideout's appeal of a district court order granting his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit reviewed the record and found no reversible error, so it affirmed the district court's order for the reasons stated in the lower court's ruling. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented to the lower court.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 09-7937

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff Appellee,
    v.
    KEVIN A. RIDEOUT, a/k/a JD,
    Defendant Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Elkins. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr.,
    Senior District Judge. (2:00-cr-00007-FPS-JES-12)

    Submitted:

    May 27, 2010

    Decided:

    June 8, 2010

    Before KING and KEENAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Kevin A. Rideout, Appellant Pro Se. Sherry L. Muncy, OFFICE OF


    THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Kevin A. Rideout appeals the district courts order
    granting his 18 U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2) (2006) motion.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

    Accordingly,

    we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.


    States

    v.

    Rideout,

    Sept. 15, 2009).


    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    No.

    2:00-cr-00007-FPS-JES-12

    We have

    (N.D.

    United
    W.

    Va.

    We dispense with oral argument because the


    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like