Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Walter Lewis, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    9 views2 pages
    Walter Lewis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lewis's motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2012-05-01 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 12-6207

    Original Title

    United States v. Walter Lewis, Jr., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Walter Lewis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lewis's motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    9 views2 pages

    United States v. Walter Lewis, JR., 4th Cir. (2012)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Walter Lewis, Jr. appealed the district court's denial of his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2). The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court affirmed the district court's ruling denying Lewis's motion to reduce his sentence. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 12-6207

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    v.
    WALTER LEWIS, JR., a/k/a Skeet,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Wheeling.
    Frederick P. Stamp,
    Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:07-cr-00005-FPS-JES-1)

    Submitted:

    April 26, 2012

    Decided:

    May 1, 2012

    Before GREGORY, AGEE, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Walter Lewis, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.


    John Castle Parr,
    Assistant United States Attorney, Wheeling, West Virginia, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

    PER CURIAM:
    Walter Lewis, Jr., appeals the district courts order
    denying

    his

    18

    U.S.C.

    3582(c)(2)

    (2006)

    motion.

    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.


    we affirm.

    We

    have

    Accordingly,

    United States v. Lewis, No. 5:07-cr-00005-FPS-JES-1

    (N.D.W. Va. filed Jan. 17, 2012 & entered Jan. 18, 2012).
    dispense

    with

    oral

    argument

    because

    the

    facts

    and

    We

    legal

    contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the


    court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like