Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Alphonso Lee Hubbard v. Edward W. Murray Clarence L. Jackson, JR., 977 F.2d 572, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Alphonso Lee Hubbard filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Edward W. Murray and Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found Hubbard's appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief based on the reasoning provided in its June 23, 1992 ruling.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1992-10-20 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 977 F.2d 572 Docket: 92-6705

    Original Title

    Alphonso Lee Hubbard v. Edward W. Murray Clarence L. Jackson, Jr., 977 F.2d 572, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Alphonso Lee Hubbard filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Edward W. Murray and Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found Hubbard's appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief based on the reasoning provided in its June 23, 1992 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Alphonso Lee Hubbard v. Edward W. Murray Clarence L. Jackson, JR., 977 F.2d 572, 4th Cir. (1992)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Alphonso Lee Hubbard filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against Edward W. Murray and Clarence L. Jackson, Jr. which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately explained in the case materials. The Fourth Circuit found Hubbard's appeal to be without merit and affirmed the district court's decision to deny relief based on the reasoning provided in its June 23, 1992 ruling.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    977 F.

    2d 572

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


    unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    Alphonso Lee HUBBARD, Plaintiff-Appellant,
    v.
    Edward W. Murray; Clarence L. Jackson, Jr., DefendantsAppellees.
    No. 92-6705.

    United States Court of Appeals,


    Fourth Circuit.
    Submitted: September 16, 1992
    Decided: October 20, 1992

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
    Virginia, at Roanoke.
    Alphonso Lee Hubbard, Appellant Pro Se.
    Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia,
    Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
    W.D.Va.
    AFFIRMED.
    Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Alphonso Lee Hubbard appeals from the district court's order denying relief
    under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
    opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on

    the reasoning of the district court. Hubbard v. Murray, No. CA-92-306-R


    (W.D. Va. June 23, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
    and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like