Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 13-2497
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
J. Frederick Motz, Senior District
Judge. (1:04-cv-02605-JFM; 1:04-md-15863-JFM)
Submitted:
Decided:
September 4, 2014
PER CURIAM:
Kaveh
appeal
from
dismissing
S.
the
Shahi
and
district
count
IV
of
Leslie
S.
courts
their
Shahi
August
initial
(the
26,
Shahis)
2013
complaint
order
and
its
We affirm.
Fed.
R.
App.
argument . . . must
the
reasons
parts
of
for
the
P.
28(a)(8)(A)
([T]he
contain . . . appellants
them,
with
record
on
citations
which
to
the
[appellants]
contentions
the
authorities
appellant
and
and
relies.).
Area
607
Med.
Ctr.,
Inc.,
562
F.3d
599,
(4th
Cir.
2009);
Edwards v. City of Goldsboro, 178 F.3d 231, 241 n.6 (4th Cir.
1999). *
for
the
Shahi v. Putnam
reasons
LLC,
No.
by
the
1:04-cv-02605-JFM
district
(D. Md.
court.
Aug.
26,
2013).
With respect to the district courts dismissal of the
amended complaint, we also find no reversible error.
Counts I,
properly
dismissed,
as
the
Shahis
did
not
plead
these
Finally,
of
count
IV
of
the
amended
complaint
because
the
Yousefi v.
v. Meyer Corp., U.S., 679 F.3d 146, 153 n.6 (4th Cir. 2012).
We therefore
affirm
the
district
courts
dismissal
of
the
amended complaint.
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED