Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • William M. Bailey v. Harley G. Lappin, Warden, 108 F.3d 1371, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views1 page
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from March 11, 1997. It involves a petitioner, William M. Bailey, appealing the denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on their review of the record and district court's opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1997-03-11 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Citations: 108 F.3d 1371 Docket: 96-7193

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from March 11, 1997. It involves a petitioner, William M. Bailey, appealing the denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on their review of the record and district court's opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views1 page

    William M. Bailey v. Harley G. Lappin, Warden, 108 F.3d 1371, 4th Cir. (1997)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from March 11, 1997. It involves a petitioner, William M. Bailey, appealing the denial of relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition by the district court. The Court of Appeals affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error based on their review of the record and district court's opinion. The Court dispenses with oral argument as the facts and legal arguments are adequately presented in the materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    108 F.

    3d 1371

    NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


    of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
    res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
    service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
    Circuit.
    William M. BAILEY, Petitioner-Appellant,
    v.
    Harley G. LAPPIN, Warden, Respondent-Appellee.
    No. 96-7193.

    United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


    Submitted Feb. 27, 1997.
    Decided March 11, 1997.

    William M. Bailey, Appellant Pro Se.


    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
    PER CURIAM:

    Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.
    2241 (1994) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
    opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning
    of the district court. Bailey v. Lappin, No. CA-96-460-5-F (E.D.N.C. July 16,
    1996). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
    are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
    not aid the decisional process.
    AFFIRMED

    You might also like