Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Steele v. Brown, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    0 views2 pages
    Darin Steele filed a Title VII complaint against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that was dismissed by the district court as time-barred. Steele appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no errors in the lower court's determination that Steele's complaint was filed after the statute of limitations expired. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing court documents.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-07-08 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-1435

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Darin Steele filed a Title VII complaint against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that was dismissed by the district court as time-barred. Steele appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no errors in the lower court's determination that Steele's complaint was filed after the statute of limitations expired. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    0 views2 pages

    Steele v. Brown, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Darin Steele filed a Title VII complaint against the Secretary of Veterans Affairs that was dismissed by the district court as time-barred. Steele appealed the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no errors in the lower court's determination that Steele's complaint was filed after the statute of limitations expired. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court and dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in existing court documents.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-1435

    DARIN T. STEELE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    JESSE BROWN, Secretary of Veterans Affairs,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Durham. Frank W. Bullock, Jr., Chief
    District Judge. (CA-96-728-1)

    Submitted:

    June 18, 1998

    Decided:

    July 8, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Darin T. Steele, Appellant Pro Se. Gill Paul Beck, OFFICE OF THE
    UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Darin T. Steele appeals the district courts order dismissing
    his Title VII complaint as time-barred. We have reviewed the record
    and the district courts opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Steele
    v. Brown, No. CA-96-728-1 (M.D.N.C. Jan. 21, 1998). We dispense
    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like