Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Tyrone Clark appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-05-15 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 97-7783

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Tyrone Clark appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    United States v. Clark, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Tyrone Clark appealed the district court's denial of his motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error in the district court's decision. The appellate court denied Clark a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal, agreeing with the district court's reasoning as stated in its opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument, finding the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the court materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 97-7783

    UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


    Plaintiff - Appellee,
    versus
    TYRONE CLARK,
    Defendant - Appellant.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Chief District Judge.
    (CR-91-310-JFM, CA-97-1236-JFM)
    Submitted:

    April 29, 1998

    Decided:

    May 15, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.


    Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
    Tyrone Clark, Appellant Pro Se. Lynne Ann Battaglia, United States
    Attorney, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying
    his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997).
    We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and
    find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district
    court. United States v. Clark, Nos. CR-91-310-JFM; CA-97-1236-JFM
    (D. Md. Nov. 14, and 19, 1997). We dispense with oral argument
    because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
    the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    DISMISSED

    You might also like