Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Mills v. Stewart, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    4 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Albert Curtis Mills' § 1983 complaint against Thomas Stewart. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's reasoning that Mills did not establish a claim for relief. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 1998-09-24 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 98-6545

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Albert Curtis Mills' § 1983 complaint against Thomas Stewart. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's reasoning that Mills did not establish a claim for relief. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    4 views2 pages

    Mills v. Stewart, 4th Cir. (1998)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief for Albert Curtis Mills' § 1983 complaint against Thomas Stewart. The court reviewed the record and district court opinion and found no reversible error. It affirmed the district court's reasoning that Mills did not establish a claim for relief. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 98-6545

    ALBERT CURTIS MILLS,


    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    THOMAS STEWART,
    Defendant - Appellee.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    Maryland, at Greenbelt. Deborah K. Chasanow, District Judge. (CA97-3626-DKC)

    Submitted:

    September 10, 1998

    Decided:

    September 24, 1998

    Before MURNAGHAN, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    Albert Curtis Mills, Appellant Pro Se. Gloria Wilson Shelton, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Baltimore, Maryland, for
    Appellee.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp. 1998) complaint. We have
    reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no
    reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
    district court. Mills v. Stewart, No. CA-97-3626-DKC (D. Md. Mar.
    20, 1998). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
    legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
    the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like