Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Lance v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Jesse R. Lance and several defendants. The district court denied relief on Lance's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2004-04-22 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 04-1066

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Jesse R. Lance and several defendants. The district court denied relief on Lance's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Lance v. Williams, 4th Cir. (2004)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit regarding a case between Jesse R. Lance and several defendants. The district court denied relief on Lance's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint and the appellate court affirmed the district court's decision, finding no reversible error after reviewing the record. The appellate court dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 04-1066

    JESSE R. LANCE,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    MAY ALICE WILLIAMS; DEPUTY PORTER; JAMES
    BECKETT; DIANA BECKETT,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Charleston. Sol Blatt, Jr., Senior District
    Judge. (CA-02-1316-2)

    Submitted:

    April 15, 2004

    Decided:

    April 22, 2004

    Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Jesse R. Lance, Appellant Pro Se. William Walter Doar, Jr., MCNAIR
    LAW FIRM, P.A., Georgetown, South Carolina, for Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Jesse

    R.

    Lance

    appeals

    the

    district

    courts

    order

    accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying


    relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    the record and find no reversible error.

    We have reviewed

    Accordingly, we affirm

    for the reasons stated by the district court.


    Williams, No. CA-02-1316-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 24, 2003).

    See Lance v.
    We dispense

    with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
    adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument
    would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    - 2 -

    You might also like