Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Anderson v. Fairmont City Police, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    1 views2 pages
    Dwayne Anderson appealed a district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of Fairmont Police Department and an officer. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2002-12-31 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 02-7172

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    Dwayne Anderson appealed a district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of Fairmont Police Department and an officer. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    1 views2 pages

    Anderson v. Fairmont City Police, 4th Cir. (2002)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    Dwayne Anderson appealed a district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against the City of Fairmont Police Department and an officer. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals reviewed the record and found no reversible error. The appeals court affirmed the district court's decision for the reasons stated in its order, finding the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented. The appeals court decided oral arguments were not necessary.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 02-7172

    DWAYNE ANDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    CITY OF FAIRMONT POLICE DEPARTMENT; DOUGLAS
    YOST, is sued in his individual and official
    capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern
    District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief
    District Judge. (CA-01-130-1)

    Submitted:

    December 19, 2002

    Decided:

    December 31, 2002

    Before WILKINS and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior


    Circuit Judge.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

    Dwayne Anderson, Appellant Pro Se. Boyd Lee Warner, Susan Wilmerink
    Gifford, WATERS, WARNER & HARRIS, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for
    Appellees.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    Dwayne Anderson appeals the district courts amended order
    denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2000) complaint.
    reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
    affirm

    for

    the

    reasons

    stated

    by

    the

    We have

    Accordingly, we

    district

    court.

    See

    Anderson v. City of Fairmont Police Dept, No. CA-01-130-1 (N.D.W.


    Va. July 12, 2002).
    facts

    and

    materials

    legal
    before

    We dispense with oral argument because the

    contentions
    the

    court

    are

    adequately

    and

    argument

    presented

    would

    not

    in

    the

    aid

    the

    decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like