Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Henderson v. Spartanburg Cnty, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    3 views2 pages
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to David Henderson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Henderson, a South Carolina inmate, had filed a complaint against the Spartanburg County Magistrate's Office and Magistrate Hinson. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Original Description:

    Filed: 2001-04-19 Precedential Status: Non-Precedential Docket: 01-6277

    Copyright

    © Public Domain

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to David Henderson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Henderson, a South Carolina inmate, had filed a complaint against the Spartanburg County Magistrate's Office and Magistrate Hinson. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    3 views2 pages

    Henderson v. Spartanburg Cnty, 4th Cir. (2001)

    Uploaded by

    Scribd Government Docs
    The United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's denial of relief to David Henderson under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Henderson, a South Carolina inmate, had filed a complaint against the Spartanburg County Magistrate's Office and Magistrate Hinson. The district court accepted the magistrate judge's recommendation to deny relief. The Court of Appeals found no reversible error in the district court's decision.

    Copyright:

    Public Domain
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 2

    UNPUBLISHED

    UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


    FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

    No. 01-6277

    DAVID HENDERSON,
    Plaintiff - Appellant,
    versus
    SPARTANBURG COUNTY MAGISTRATES OFFICE; MAGISTRATE HINSON, Individually and in his official
    capacity,
    Defendants - Appellees.

    Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
    South Carolina, at Spartanburg.
    Margaret B. Seymour, District
    Judge. (CA-00-3160-7-24BG)

    Submitted:

    April 12, 2001

    Decided:

    April 19, 2001

    Before NIEMEYER, WILLIAMS, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

    Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.


    David Henderson, Appellant Pro Se.

    Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


    See Local Rule 36(c).

    PER CURIAM:
    David Henderson, a South Carolina inmate, appeals the district
    courts order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.A. 1983 (West Supp.
    2000) complaint under 28 U.S.C.A. 1915A (West Supp. 2000).

    We

    have reviewed the record and the district courts opinion accepting
    the magistrate judges recommendation and find no reversible error.
    Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
    Henderson v. Spartanburg County Magistrates Office, No. CA-003160-7-24BG (D.S.C. filed Jan. 17, 2001; entered Jan. 18, 2001).
    We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court
    and argument would not aid the decisional process.

    AFFIRMED

    You might also like